How Do You Build An Attack Surface Management Program?

The blog explores how to build and measure an effective attack surface management program

Defining an attack surface management program

Security teams operate in a state of constant motion. Every new application, cloud resource, and third-party integration adds complexity to an organization’s external-facing attack surface. Meanwhile, attackers move at a relentless pace, exploiting misconfigurations and exposures within hours of their discovery. Despite this, many organizations struggle to define what an effective Attack Surface Management program should look like.

Some attempt to monitor their assets with legacy tools designed for slower-moving infrastructures. Others rely on periodic vulnerability scans that only capture a moment in time, leaving them blind to new risks emerging between assessments.

However, an effective Attack Surface Management (ASM) program is more than a collection of security tools. It is a structured, continuous approach to identifying, monitoring, and mitigating security exposures—before they become incidents. The difference between a strong ASM program and an ineffective one can be measured in time: How quickly can security teams detect new assets? How fast can they validate the exploitability of an exposure? How long does it take to remediate risk?

The goal isn’t just to identify vulnerabilities but to systematically reduce the time an organization remains exposed. Here’s what it takes to build an ASM program that keeps up with the speed of modern threats.

1. Continuous Asset Discovery: Knowing What to Protect

Every attack surface is in a constant state of flux. Traditional asset management tools fail to capture the full picture because they rely on static inventories that become outdated the moment a new asset is added. This gap in visibility allows shadow IT, misconfigured cloud resources, and forgotten subdomains to persist unnoticed—until attackers find them first.

Security teams can’t defend what they don’t know exists. Attackers exploit unknown assets—shadow IT, forgotten subdomains, misconfigured cloud services—because they often lack monitoring and oversight. A strong Attack Surface Management program starts with full visibility into every external-facing system.

To achieve comprehensive discovery, security teams should:

• Automate discovery: Manual asset inventories become outdated the moment a new domain or cloud resource is created. Automated asset discovery ensures security teams always have an up-to-date map of their external attack surface.
• Expand beyond traditional scanning: Relying solely on periodic IP-based scanning leaves blind spots. A robust discovery process incorporates DNS analysis, certificate tracking, third-party service monitoring, and cloud metadata analysis to identify assets tied to the organization.
• Detect ephemeral assets: Temporary cloud resources and development environments may only exist for hours, yet they can still introduce risk. Continuous discovery should track these short-lived assets to prevent security gaps.
• Enrich asset data: Knowing an asset exists is only the first step. Security teams should track what technologies are running, whether an asset is actively in use, and whether it is accessible externally. Metadata such as SSL certificates, DNS records, and open ports provide context for assessing risk.

Without an automated, continuous approach, security teams risk missing exposures that attackers will find first. A strong discovery process eliminates guesswork and ensures organizations always have a clear picture of what needs protection.

2. Risk-Based Prioritization: Focusing on What Matters

Not all vulnerabilities are equal. Not every security issue demands immediate action. Security teams are often overwhelmed with long lists of potential issues, many of which have little to no real-world exploitability. Organizations waste time chasing false positives and low-impact vulnerabilities when they lack a structured approach to prioritization. Without a way to separate noise from actual threats, teams waste valuable time chasing false alerts and high-impact exposures remain unaddressed. The key to effective ASM is focusing on exposures that pose real, exploitable threats to critical assets.

Security teams should refine their prioritization strategy by:

• Moving beyond CVSS scores: A vulnerability’s numerical severity rating doesn’t always reflect real-world risk. Instead of relying solely on static scores, teams should assess factors like exploitability, exposure time, and business impact.
• Validating vulnerabilities with proof-of-concept testing: Security teams often lose time debating whether a vulnerability is theoretical or actionable. Implementing exploit-based verification ensures focus remains on issues with confirmed security impact.
• Assigning asset importance: Not all systems are equally critical. An internet-facing development server doesn’t carry the same risk as a production database. Assigning context-driven importance to assets ensures that security efforts align with business priorities.
• Eliminating alert fatigue: Overwhelmed security teams often default to addressing issues in the order they appear. Instead, organizations should structure their remediation workflows to focus first on vulnerabilities that create meaningful exposure, rather than wasting cycles on noise.

Prioritization isn’t just about fixing vulnerabilities—it’s about fixing the right ones first. A structured, risk-based approach ensures that security teams allocate their time and resources where they matter most.

3. Proactive Monitoring: Reducing Exposure Time

Security gaps aren’t just a matter of if they will be exploited but when. The longer an exposure remains unaddressed, the more likely it is to be targeted. Attackers move quickly, scanning for vulnerabilities within hours of public disclosure. Organizations that rely on periodic scans to detect exposures will always be a step behind. Attackers routinely scan for and exploit newly disclosed vulnerabilities in a matter of hours—often before security teams even become aware of them.

To reduce exposure time, security teams should:

• Implement continuous scanning: Daily or weekly scans leave critical windows of risk. Hourly or real-time assessments provide visibility into exposures before attackers can exploit them.
• Monitor for shadow IT and forgotten assets: Business units and development teams frequently deploy new assets without security oversight. Proactive monitoring ensures that untracked systems don’t become unexpected entry points.
• Track indicators of compromise (IoCs): A vulnerability might exist for weeks before an organization becomes aware it was exploited. Monitoring attack patterns, data leaks, and threat intelligence feeds helps detect early signs of malicious activity.
• Identify third-party risks: An organization’s attack surface extends beyond its own infrastructure. Security teams should track exposures in cloud platforms, repositories, and third-party applications that handle sensitive data.

A strong Attack Surface Management program doesn’t just detect issues—it minimizes the time between discovery and remediation. Shortening exposure windows prevents attackers from capitalizing on security gaps. Cyberattacks don’t operate on a set schedule, and neither should attack surface management. Continuous monitoring ensures that risks are detected and mitigated before they can be leveraged in an attack.

4. Metrics and Benchmarks: Measuring Program Effectiveness

Security teams often struggle to quantify their impact. Without clear benchmarks, it’s difficult to determine whether an Attack Surface Management program is improving or merely keeping up with existing risks. Metrics provide a data-driven approach to evaluating security posture and refining processes.

Key performance indicators for ASM should include:

• Mean Time to Remediation (MTTR): A vulnerability remains a risk until it’s addressed. Tracking how long it takes security teams to remediate confirmed exposures helps identify bottlenecks in workflows.
• Mean Time of Exposure (MTE): The duration between an exposure appearing in the attack surface and security teams detecting it. A shorter MTE reduces attacker dwell time.
• Remediation velocity: How quickly teams resolve high-priority vulnerabilities compared to industry benchmarks. This metric highlights whether security efforts are keeping pace with evolving threats.
• Coverage of asset discovery: The percentage of internet-facing assets being actively monitored. If discovery lags behind business operations, security teams risk missing critical exposures.

An Attack Surface Management program isn’t just about identifying vulnerabilities—it’s about reducing risk over time. Measuring progress with meaningful metrics ensures that security teams can demonstrate value and continuously improve their processes. By tracking these metrics, security leaders can identify gaps in their ASM strategy and optimize processes to reduce risk more effectively.

5. Integration with Broader Security Initiatives

Attack surface management isn’t a standalone function. It should seamlessly integrate with other security initiatives, ensuring that attack surface insights inform the organization’s broader defense strategy.

Security teams can maximize the impact of ASM by:

• Aligning with vulnerability management: ASM findings should feed directly into existing remediation workflows, ensuring that verified exposures are treated as part of the organization’s broader risk-reduction strategy.
• Supporting Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM): ASM plays a foundational role in CTEM by continuously assessing external-facing assets for risk, reducing reliance on scheduled assessments.
• Enhancing Zero Trust initiatives: Attack surface insights help organizations enforce least privilege access by identifying exposed assets that require additional authentication or segmentation.
• Facilitating collaboration across teams: ASM data should be shared with IT, DevOps, and compliance teams to ensure security decisions align with business objectives.

By embedding ASM into broader security programs, organizations gain a more comprehensive defense strategy—one where external risks are continuously assessed and addressed. ASM should act as the connective tissue between security operations, vulnerability management, and risk teams, ensuring a unified approach to external threat mitigation.

6. Overcoming Common Challenges

Many organizations struggle to implement ASM effectively. Common roadblocks include incomplete asset visibility, outdated processes, and lack of buy-in from stakeholders. Addressing these challenges requires a structured approach.

To build a successful ASM program, security teams should:

• Eliminate visibility gaps: Asset discovery should go beyond known infrastructure. Organizations need to identify shadow IT, third-party dependencies, and cloud-based resources that may not be tracked in traditional inventories.
• Move away from legacy tools: Traditional vulnerability scanners and periodic audits fail to keep pace with today’s attack surfaces. ASM requires continuous monitoring and automated discovery to remain effective.
• Gain executive and IT buy-in: Security teams must demonstrate the business value of ASM—reducing breach risk, improving operational efficiency, and streamlining remediation workflows. Stakeholder alignment ensures ASM becomes a priority.
• Optimize remediation workflows: Many security teams struggle with information overload. Establishing clear prioritization frameworks and integrating ASM insights into existing vulnerability management processes helps reduce operational friction.

A well-executed ASM program requires the right tools, processes, and organizational support. Addressing these common challenges ensures that attack surface management is both actionable and impactful.

The Business Impact of an Effective Attack Surface Management Program

The ultimate goal of ASM isn’t just security—it’s business resilience. A well-implemented Attack Surface Management program strengthens an organization’s ability to reduce breach risk by identifying and closing exposures before attackers can exploit them. It enhances operational efficiency by eliminating false positives and minimizing the time spent investigating non-critical issues. It also increases security agility by continuously adapting to evolving attack surfaces in real time.

Security teams no longer have the luxury of reacting to threats as they arise. ASM must be proactive, continuous, and deeply integrated into an organization’s broader security strategy. Organizations that get ASM right gain a critical advantage. Instead of scrambling to respond to incidents, they operate confidently, knowing that their external-facing assets are continuously monitored, prioritized, and secured.

FIND OUT MORE about our ASM Product